"GHETTO SCHOLARSHIP" AND THE ORIGINS OF ISLAM
I've been warned not to dignify these brothers'
words with an answer; but in all fairness and
respect due to those affected by this topic,
I will state the following and nothing further
for the time being.
This is a subject that, at the present time and
under the present circumstances related to my
scheduling, I cannot undertake to elaborate
on at any length. Suffice it to say, NO ONE
is "ducking" you Dr.True Islam or Dr. Muhammad, and
your absurd tauntings to try to "egg on a fight"
to debate this issue, exposes your own infantile
"ghetto scholarship" mentality.
If you have something to say...just SAY IT; in
the same manner as those you accuse of being
"slave makers of the poor, who teach the poor
lies... the bloodsuckers of the poor". Take
your arguments to the people in your OWN forums
as they have done; state your case, post it on
YouTube, and let the people decide. This "debate"...
this "meet me after school in the parking lot"
confrontation you keep crying for...THAT'S
sensationalistic...THAT'S "ghetto scholarship"!
Speaking for myself; it is obvious from the contents
of your recent post that the range of your own "research
scholarship" has yet to plough the necessary depths
of analysis that has taken me to where I have mined
the bulk of my information. At THIS time however, I
don't intend to draw you any more "maps of proof"
other than those I've already briefly drawn in my
True there are prevaricators attempting to under-
mine the orthodox superstructures of so-called
"black" history to achieve their own ends, but
there are those scholars in the east (like ourselves
here in the western Diaspora) who have found many
vital missing pieces of solid history (PARTICULARLY
'Dravidian'/Hindu scholars) showing the unmistakable
corollary between the ancient worship of SHIVA, and
worship-rituals and ceremonies now practiced as "Islam".
And HERE'S where any true investigation of the 'history'
of Islam should begin.
We already know of the suppressed historical data
concerning black antiquities right here in the Americas
that even pre-date Africa's and India's most ancient
legacies; antiquities not yet given their proper place
within the scholarship and annals of 'black' history.
So how does one presume to be so cock-sure about a
historical 'new-bee' like Mohammed, and the assumed
legacies of a "johnny-come-lately" religion called "Islam"?
And if you think to tell me that Mohammed's Islam was
responsible for "introducing" said ancient architecture,
ceremonies and rituals to the Shiva worshippers of the
Indus Valley through their 'jihads against infidels';
again, your "scholarship" needs a bit more time to
ripen on the vine.
In fact; you need to BEGIN your arguments by explaining
to everyone how it is that the so-called older "mosques"
attributed to the Muslim/Islamic "builders" of Mohammed’s
invasions, have recently been discovered by prominent
Dravidian archeologists to have the same distinct designs
and markings directly related to the ancient INDUS VALLEY
temple-builders and their explicit styles of architecture.
But you can't. Because these ancient "mosques" are in fact
the STOLEN temples of worship once built for, and dedicated
to SHIVA; temple architecture (rituals and ceremonies)
'jacked' by Mohammed's invaders, which existed as the
spiritual legacies of the Indus Valley civilizations for
EONS before what is now worshipped as the 3-headed beast
ever existed; Christianism, Judaism and Islamism.
Islamism, (or what is "practiced" AS Islam today through
Qu'ran/al-Qur’ân; meaning "the recitation"), is in fact
a "johnny-come-lately" hodge-podge of "UNIVERSAL TRUTHS";
that is, fundamental philosophies based in the ancient
science of ASTRONOMY——but, like Christianism and
Judaism today, is practiced through its anthropomorphic
and profane twin "ASTROLATRY"——a dogmatized convolution
of our original sciences that mapped and decoded the
mathematical and photo-geometric Light-Code 'spectraglyphs'
of the sky, which they translated into the elaborately
woven cryptic prose and verses that became "scriptures"
about God's (the stars') overall relationship to Nature
and Man—taught to the world by our "black" ancestors
for a thousand millennia BEFORE an "Allah", or even the
language that created his name ever existed; high sciences
which, in the end, were twisted into a theo-political tool
conjured up to organize and control the peoples of that
region to serve the greed and avarice of the Papal
Emperors of Rome.
And no; "Vatican Assassins" and "comic books"(???!!) are
not the only sources where one searches to find Islam's
BLACK Augustinian origins ("Saint" Augustine was black)
to fit the missing pieces of this equation.
Again; the "true" historical proof that exposes the
myth of Islam being "inspired" teachings received by
Mohammed from "divine revelations in a cave", lay in
the evidence of the location of it's holiest temple,
the origins of its tenets, its rituals and its practices
as being blatant thefts and plaguarizations of virtually
ALL the ancient structures, rituals, ceremonies and
teachings of the black civilizations of the Indus Valley;
not to mention the rip-off of ancient Kem. The parts
played by the Vatican, and later the British monarchy
in fusing and interweaving their own secularized Judeo-Christian 'prophets' with Astrology, Kemetic and Hindu
philosophy, their rituals and tenets to create this new
"Muslim-mix", will be addressed when I decide to re-visit
this topic in public forum at a later date.
Strange thing though? With all your self-righteous
ranting about the newest information surfacing to
challenge the legitimacy of 'Islam' (and NOT just
the tenuous overview of a "Vatican Assassins" - a
Christian Crakkka with racist issues; or the occult
sigils use by Islam such as the star and crescent,
which is but another rip-off of our Kemetic symbolism),
you failed to dispute ANY of the information I
discussed showing in pictographic depth the DIRECT
relationship of a 'johnny-come-lately' "Islam" to
the nearly 3000 year-old worship of SHIVA; even to
the extent that Noble Drew Ali himself, along with
his personal secretary, secretly recognized this in
their gestures and dress.
Hmmmm. Maybe that's an issue you'll include at a later
time, when you get another chance to call me some more
In closing; I'm QUITE sure I will be receiving a storm of
rebuttals to this brief notation on the subject; maybe
even to my character once again as an evasive "bloodsucker
to the poor" (LOL) who has no REAL "proof" of anything.
That's all well and good.
(Actually, it's all kind of amusing to me)
In the meantime Mr."Muhammad Muhammad" and Mr."True Islam"...;
lobbing invectives at me in order to sucker me into playing
your childish head games of intellectual "tit-for-tat", is
THE quintessential earmark of a "ghetto-scholar", and I
won't be a party to such nonsense. Your personal insults
do not impress me, nor do they inspire me to want to
treat this as anything more than the outbursts of spoiled,
self-centered pre-teens, un-deservedly demanding the
immediate attention of a busy parent.
When the appropriate time comes, I will again take up
this delicate issue and address it (hopefully) to the
full satisfaction of all concerned. And those of you
who doubt my reputation for following through with what
I say I INTEND to do ......GO CHECK THE RECORD!
In the meantime; try to be a little more civil when
you address your elders. You should be ashamed of
yourselves. You should know better.
Again; this is my FIRST and LAST 'public comment'
on this issue as it stands (for now).
My honor, love and peace to ALL the Family.
Together to Light,